What are the Social Security trust funds, and how are.

Jan 30, Washington, DC, January 30, – Contrary to recent reports suggesting that Bush-era tax cuts have increased income inequality in the U.S., the gap between rich and poor in recent decades has been driven mostly by the business cycle, i.e.

multi-year fluctuations in economic activity, according to a new report by the Tax Foundation. Jan 04, The Bush tax cuts, which lowered rates on both income and capital gains, also helped fuel the growth in income inequality, according to the report.

Retrieved December 17,

The difference in tax rates. 7 rowsOct 23, The biggest tax policy changes enacted under President George W. Bush were the 20Estimated Reading Time: 11 mins. Intaxes reduced income inequality by 5%.

Inhowever, taxes reduced income inequality by less than 4%.

The explosive path of federal debt under the alternative fiscal scenario underscores the need for large and timely policy changes to put the federal government on a sustainable fiscal course.

Taxes were more progressive and had a greater equalizing effect in than in In other words, the Bush tax cuts increased income inequality.

Jun 06, Instead, the Bush-era (–08) tax changes actually increased inequality by delivering more than half of their benefits in to the top 10 percent of earners, who make over, a year. In fact, 38 percent of the dollar benefits went to the top 1 percent of earners (tax filers making over,), who received tax breaks averaging over, Jan 07, While the Bush tax cuts were designed as overwhelmingly regressive, the most recent deal does add some progressivity to the tax code, by allowing the cuts to expire on the top percent of taxpayers (remember that even if taxes do go up on someone earning, that person still enjoys lower rates on income below the,/, threshold).

Jan 02, Fueled income inequality:This chart from the Congressional Research Service suggests that the Bush tax cuts, which significantly reduce top Estimated Reading Time: 5 mins.